I just print a new limiter image for calibrate Photopolymer gravure I used the P2-NU-HDPK-MASTER and the P2-NU-HDPK-HahnFAPearl curves , the problem is the shadows are not linear I got darker values on the midtones than on the shadows, I dont know if the curves I used are not optimized for UV blocking, What curve should I use for UV light blocking on Piezography 2 HDPK inks?
Done! I printed the limiter file using the Hahnemuhle Photo Rag 308 curve and matte inks, now my print is to dark on the shadows I need to limit around 131 step, see attachment.
So there should be no need to switch between black inks – just select the correct P2 curve. Or am I missing something? Could this account for the dramatic loss of shadow separation?
For now I have printed a new target using the limit density to 129 steps and adjusting the highlights with the tweaking curve contrast, and selecting the MATTE INK option and I just got a very nice negative for start the linearization, when I tried to use the P2-SEL-UHD-HahnPhoRag308.quad with PHOTO INK I got a very very dark and grainy print.
Walker I’m curious about why selecting photo ink in a Matte curve the print is so Mate, and when I select photo ink with the same Matte curve I got a more glossy negative (positive)?
I actually think there is something wrong with your permissions and that you are only printing the K channel (be it PK or MK) because of that. It should not be that dark on the paper or film.
Re-install quadtoneRIP to fix permissions then try again.
Also, if you are using a P2 UHD curve, have your printer set to PK, and have nothing in the PK channel but PiezoFlush than this will print very light. But not that light across the board unless you permissions are somehow messed up.