Blocky curve using i1iSis for linearisation

I followed Walker’s video for printing the 31 x 9 step test chart in Print-Tool and measuring it in i1Profiler v3.30 using i1iSis and the curves in Excel are blocking and weird.

When I loaded the Piezography-21x16step-i1Pro2.pwxf workflow for the i1Pro 2 to measure using i1Pro 3 to see whether it was the iSis, the chart could not be measured because it was different from the Piezography-21x16step-i1Pro2.tif printed in Print-Tool. From within i1Profiler I printed the chart using QTR printer and was able to measure using i1Pro 3 and create a proper curve.

Back to the iSis and I printed the Piezography-512step-i1iSis.tif in Print-tool and measured using Piezography-512step-i1iSis.pwxf for the iSis, then copied measurements into Excel and was able to create a proper curve:

The prints from both linearised curves look outstanding btw.

Would like to understand what’s going on with the blocky curve on Piezography-31x9step-isis.tif and Piezography-31x9step-isis1.pwxf when measured using the iSis. Also why the targets are different for Piezography-21x16step-i1Pro2.tif and Piezography-21x16step-i1Pro2.pwxf.

TIA

Should this go on Github instead?

31x not supported yet. Feel free to file the bug fix request
21x target needs fixing (already filed on GitHub)

regards,
Walker

Thanks Walker, will do. I started with the 512 step and the results are amazing.

The process I’m following is:

  1. Print the 512 step for each warm, neutral and cool, then measure 24 hours later and produce a curve
  2. Using curve from step 1 above, print the 700 step for each warm, neutral and cool, then measure 24 hour later and produce a curve

Do I need to produce curves in a similar manner for noGCO etc?

TIA

yes,

best regards,
Walker

Is there any problem with going in straight off with a 700 patch target or do I have to do 512 first, then do 700?

no problem, you can do just the 700

best,
Walker

Glad you said that Walker - on my third print :wink: Thank you!